Mailing List:
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Add newDisplay options
0
replies
Bitcoin Core 0.14.2 released
started 2017-06-17 11:40:22 UTC
2017-06-17 11:40:22 UTC
Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev
1
reply
BIP proposal - Dandelion: Privacy Preserving Transaction Propagation
started 2017-06-12 14:46:23 UTC
2017-06-13 01:00:50 UTC
Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
10
replies
Hypothetical 2 MB hardfork to follow BIP148
started 2017-05-30 13:27:58 UTC
2017-06-12 16:27:14 UTC
Nathan Cook via bitcoin-dev
1
reply
Bitcoin pointers
started 2017-06-11 20:05:24 UTC
2017-06-11 20:19:20 UTC
Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev
2
replies
extended BIP9 activation of segwit, for legacy nodes
started 2017-04-14 20:12:34 UTC
2017-06-11 19:31:00 UTC
Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
5
replies
The BIP148 chain split may be inevitable
started 2017-06-09 06:48:24 UTC
2017-06-11 17:12:35 UTC
Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
6
replies
BIP149 timeout-- why so far in the future?
started 2017-05-23 17:50:12 UTC
2017-06-11 14:29:08 UTC
Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
19
replies
Replay attacks make BIP148 and BIP149 untennable
started 2017-06-06 22:39:28 UTC
2017-06-08 13:31:19 UTC
Nick Johnson via bitcoin-dev
23
replies
User Activated Soft Fork Split Protection
started 2017-06-07 00:56:10 UTC
2017-06-08 09:20:28 UTC
James Hilliard via bitcoin-dev
0
replies
SegWit activation proposal with 2MB Hard Fork by next Block Halving on 2020
started 2017-06-05 20:30:23 UTC
2017-06-05 20:30:23 UTC
Upal Chakraborty via bitcoin-dev
28
replies
Segwit2Mb - combined soft/hard fork - Request For Comments
started 2017-03-31 21:09:18 UTC
2017-06-03 21:05:23 UTC
Oliver Petruzel via bitcoin-dev
7
replies
Compatibility-Oriented Omnibus Proposal
started 2017-05-29 01:18:13 UTC
2017-06-02 21:57:12 UTC
Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev
3
replies
[RFC] Lightning invoice/payment format draft
started 2017-06-01 01:28:20 UTC
2017-06-01 05:54:37 UTC
Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev
0
replies
Block Filter Digest profiling
started 2017-06-01 02:11:48 UTC
2017-06-01 02:11:48 UTC
Karl Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev
6
replies
Emergency Deployment of SegWit as a partial mitigation of CVE-2017-9230
started 2017-05-26 19:20:42 UTC
2017-05-31 06:17:59 UTC
Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
1
reply
Improvement Proposal
started 2017-05-30 13:48:30 UTC
2017-05-30 17:30:55 UTC
praxeology_guy via bitcoin-dev
10
replies
Barry Silbert segwit agreement
started 2017-05-22 06:12:08 UTC
2017-05-28 23:28:11 UTC
James Hilliard via bitcoin-dev
4
replies
Reduced signalling threshold activation of existing segwit deployment
started 2017-05-22 22:40:13 UTC
2017-05-23 16:56:51 UTC
James Hilliard via bitcoin-dev
40
replies
I do not support the BIP 148 UASF
started 2017-04-14 07:56:31 UTC
2017-05-23 15:46:02 UTC
Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
0
replies
A BIP proposal for conveniently referring to confirmed transactions
started 2017-05-23 15:30:58 UTC
2017-05-23 15:30:58 UTC
Велеслав via bitcoin-dev
0
replies
Proposal to allow users to configure the maximum block weight based on a support threshold
started 2017-05-23 10:50:37 UTC
2017-05-23 10:50:37 UTC
Tomas via bitcoin-dev
8
replies
Rolling UTXO set hashes
started 2017-05-15 20:01:14 UTC
2017-05-23 04:47:48 UTC
Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev
5
replies
A proposal to reintroduce the disabled script opcodes
started 2017-05-19 12:03:59 UTC
2017-05-22 16:43:11 UTC
Ethan Heilman via bitcoin-dev
0
replies
BIP135 implementation on Bitcoin Core available for review
started 2017-05-22 12:10:20 UTC
2017-05-22 12:10:20 UTC
Sancho Panza via bitcoin-dev
7
replies
A BIP proposal for segwit addresses
started 2017-03-20 21:35:08 UTC
2017-05-20 20:13:13 UTC
Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
16
replies
BIP: Block signal enforcement via tx fees
started 2017-05-12 19:22:56 UTC
2017-05-20 05:05:43 UTC
Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
3
replies
BIP Proposal: Rate Limiting with server specified Proof of Work challenges
started 2017-05-08 02:48:54 UTC
2017-05-19 12:03:06 UTC
Karl Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev
5
replies
Treating ‘ASICBOOST’ as a Security Vulnerability
started 2017-05-18 13:44:47 UTC
2017-05-19 12:01:59 UTC
Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
0
replies
BIP39 (mnemonic seeds) Unicode normalization compatibility issue
started 2017-05-17 17:01:04 UTC
2017-05-17 17:01:04 UTC
Zach Lym via bitcoin-dev
4
replies
TXO commitments do not need a soft-fork to be useful
started 2017-02-23 01:11:47 UTC
2017-05-16 12:23:53 UTC
Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
Click to Load More...
Loading...