bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org

1

reply

A new payment address format for segregated witness or not?

started 2015-12-21 11:14:12 UTC

2015-12-21 21:48:23 UTC

Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev

17

replies

Forget dormant UTXOs without confiscating bitcoin

started 2015-12-13 03:55:24 UTC

2015-12-21 09:34:06 UTC

Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev

11

replies

On the security of softforks

started 2015-12-18 08:30:38 UTC

2015-12-21 01:16:29 UTC

jl2012 via bitcoin-dev

5

replies

Segregated witness softfork with moderate adoption has very small block size effect

started 2015-12-19 22:49:25 UTC

2015-12-20 09:37:26 UTC

Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev

29

replies

Segregated Witness in the context of Scaling Bitcoin

started 2015-12-17 02:38:30 UTC

2015-12-20 05:03:20 UTC

Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev

9

replies

The increase of max block size should be determined by block height instead of block time

started 2015-12-19 01:17:03 UTC

2015-12-20 00:20:38 UTC

Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev

12

replies

Segregated Witness features wish list

started 2015-12-10 12:47:35 UTC

2015-12-14 18:50:51 UTC

Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev

9

replies

Standard BIP Draft: Turing Pseudo-Completeness

started 2015-12-10 07:35:17 UTC

2015-12-13 03:01:45 UTC

Emin Gün Sirer via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

Not this again.

started 2015-12-10 12:57:31 UTC

2015-12-10 12:57:31 UTC

Satoshi Nakamoto via bitcoin-dev

15

replies

Scaling by Partitioning

started 2015-12-08 22:27:18 UTC

2015-12-10 10:33:58 UTC

Akiva Lichtner via bitcoin-dev

1

reply

"Subsidy fraud" ?

started 2015-12-10 03:26:05 UTC

2015-12-10 03:43:22 UTC

Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

Impacts of Segregated Witness softfork

started 2015-12-09 22:15:01 UTC

2015-12-09 22:15:01 UTC

jl2012--- via bitcoin-dev

3

replies

BIP 9 style version bits for txns

started 2015-12-08 20:27:24 UTC

2015-12-09 04:27:48 UTC

Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

Can kick

started 2015-12-08 18:59:51 UTC

2015-12-08 18:59:51 UTC

Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

Key.run: BIP-70 Payments and OP_RETURN

started 2015-12-08 17:28:24 UTC

2015-12-08 17:28:24 UTC

Toby Padilla via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

Coalescing Transactions BIP Draft

started 2015-12-08 05:39:12 UTC

2015-12-08 05:39:12 UTC

Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev

2

replies

Some transcripts from the Scaling Bitcoin workshops

started 2015-12-07 12:50:23 UTC

2015-12-07 13:21:58 UTC

Pindar Wong via bitcoin-dev

7

replies

Blockchain verification flag (BIP draft)

started 2015-12-04 14:26:22 UTC

2015-12-06 12:26:15 UTC

Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev

14

replies

[BIP Draft] Datastream compression of Blocks and Transactions

started 2015-12-01 05:12:24 UTC

2015-12-04 19:30:33 UTC

Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

Scaling Bitcoin - summarizing non-jgarzik block size BIPs

started 2015-12-02 22:39:57 UTC

2015-12-02 22:39:57 UTC

Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev

2

replies

Opt-in Full Replace-By-Fee (Full-RBF)

started 2015-11-17 06:42:18 UTC

2015-12-02 15:27:39 UTC

Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev

1

reply

Test Results for : Datasstream Compression of Blocks and Tx's

started 2015-11-29 03:41:51 UTC

2015-11-30 22:53:39 UTC

Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev

1

reply

[BIP] OP_CHECKPRIVPUBPAIR

started 2015-11-27 17:13:23 UTC

2015-11-30 05:41:43 UTC

Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev

1

reply

Use CPFP as consensus critical for Full-RBF

started 2015-11-29 09:50:14 UTC

2015-11-29 17:55:08 UTC

Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev

15

replies

request BIP number for: "Support for Datastream Compression"

started 2015-11-10 01:18:10 UTC

2015-11-29 11:15:32 UTC

Peter Tschipper via bitcoin-dev

13

replies

Alternative name for CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)

started 2015-11-24 16:30:52 UTC

2015-11-27 16:14:10 UTC

Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

Why sharding the blockchain is difficult

started 2015-11-26 03:37:47 UTC

2015-11-26 03:37:47 UTC

Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev

10

replies

OP_CHECKWILDCARDSIGVERIFY or "Wildcard Inputs" or "Coalescing Transactions"

started 2015-11-24 23:34:35 UTC

2015-11-25 23:03:32 UTC

Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev

2

replies

BIP68: Second-level granularity doesn't make sense

started 2015-11-24 10:36:18 UTC

2015-11-24 11:58:40 UTC

Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

BIP68: Relative lock-time through consensus-enforced sequence numbers (update)

started 2015-11-21 20:13:05 UTC

2015-11-21 20:13:05 UTC

Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev