ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
2018-05-15 01:22:26 UTC
Good morning Luke,
In context you are discussing the transaction serialization, though, so perhaps `SIGHASH_SINGLE`, is unaffected?
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
(Maybe it should be the first output
instead of the last... Is there any legitimate reason one would have multiple
such dummy outputs?)
None, but how about use of `SIGHASH_SINGLE` flag? If a dummy output is added as the first, would it not require adjustment of the inputs of the transaction?instead of the last... Is there any legitimate reason one would have multiple
such dummy outputs?)
In context you are discussing the transaction serialization, though, so perhaps `SIGHASH_SINGLE`, is unaffected?
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj