Discussion:
[bitcoin-dev] BIP Final status
Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
2016-02-08 22:17:55 UTC
Permalink
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/314 proposes updating the status of many
Accepted BIPs to Final:

BIP 11: M-of-N Standard Transactions
BIP 14: Protocol Version and User Agent
BIP 21: URI Scheme
BIP 22: getblocktemplate - Fundamentals
BIP 23: getblocktemplate - Pooled Mining
BIP 31: Pong message
BIP 32: Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets
BIP 34: Block v2, Height in Coinbase
BIP 35: mempool message
BIP 37: Connection Bloom filtering
BIP 65: OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY

This PR has been open for a week, and I plan to merge it within the next week
unless there are objections.

Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to upgrade
five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs ACKs from the
champions of the BIPs:

BIP 50: March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem, by Gavin Andresen
BIP 60: Fixed Length "version" Message (Relay-Transactions Field), by Amir
Taaki
BIP 64: getutxo message, by Mike Hearn
BIP 66: Strict DER signatures, by Pieter Wuille
BIP 73: Use "Accept" header for response type negotiation with Payment Request
URLs, by Stephen Pair

Thanks,

Luke
Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
2016-02-08 22:57:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to
upgrade five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs
BIP 50: March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem, by Gavin Andresen
It may be good to update BIP 50 with the new information that calling it
a "hard fork" misses subtleties about what happened during that fork. In
particular, 0.7 rejection of the chain was non-deterministic, based on
having seen a re-org in a specific way.
I agree BIP 50 could use some rephrasing, but the May 2013 change was
definitely a hardfork, despite the problems with the pre-March protocol.

Luke

Loading...