bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org

0

replies

Bitcoin Core 0.14.2 released

started 2017-06-17 16:40:22 UTC

2017-06-17 16:40:22 UTC

Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev

1

reply

BIP proposal - Dandelion: Privacy Preserving Transaction Propagation

started 2017-06-12 19:46:23 UTC

2017-06-13 06:00:50 UTC

Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev

10

replies

Hypothetical 2 MB hardfork to follow BIP148

started 2017-05-30 18:27:58 UTC

2017-06-12 21:27:14 UTC

Nathan Cook via bitcoin-dev

1

reply

Bitcoin pointers

started 2017-06-12 01:05:24 UTC

2017-06-12 01:19:20 UTC

Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev

2

replies

extended BIP9 activation of segwit, for legacy nodes

started 2017-04-15 01:12:34 UTC

2017-06-12 00:31:00 UTC

Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev

5

replies

The BIP148 chain split may be inevitable

started 2017-06-09 11:48:24 UTC

2017-06-11 22:12:35 UTC

Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev

6

replies

BIP149 timeout-- why so far in the future?

started 2017-05-23 22:50:12 UTC

2017-06-11 19:29:08 UTC

Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev

19

replies

Replay attacks make BIP148 and BIP149 untennable

started 2017-06-07 03:39:28 UTC

2017-06-08 18:31:19 UTC

Nick Johnson via bitcoin-dev

23

replies

User Activated Soft Fork Split Protection

started 2017-06-07 05:56:10 UTC

2017-06-08 14:20:28 UTC

James Hilliard via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

SegWit activation proposal with 2MB Hard Fork by next Block Halving on 2020

started 2017-06-06 01:30:23 UTC

2017-06-06 01:30:23 UTC

Upal Chakraborty via bitcoin-dev

28

replies

Segwit2Mb - combined soft/hard fork - Request For Comments

started 2017-04-01 02:09:18 UTC

2017-06-04 02:05:23 UTC

Oliver Petruzel via bitcoin-dev

7

replies

Compatibility-Oriented Omnibus Proposal

started 2017-05-29 06:18:13 UTC

2017-06-03 02:57:12 UTC

Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev

3

replies

[RFC] Lightning invoice/payment format draft

started 2017-06-01 06:28:20 UTC

2017-06-01 10:54:37 UTC

Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

Block Filter Digest profiling

started 2017-06-01 07:11:48 UTC

2017-06-01 07:11:48 UTC

Karl Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev

6

replies

Emergency Deployment of SegWit as a partial mitigation of CVE-2017-9230

started 2017-05-27 00:20:42 UTC

2017-05-31 11:17:59 UTC

Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev

1

reply

Improvement Proposal

started 2017-05-30 18:48:30 UTC

2017-05-30 22:30:55 UTC

praxeology_guy via bitcoin-dev

10

replies

Barry Silbert segwit agreement

started 2017-05-22 11:12:08 UTC

2017-05-29 04:28:11 UTC

James Hilliard via bitcoin-dev

4

replies

Reduced signalling threshold activation of existing segwit deployment

started 2017-05-23 03:40:13 UTC

2017-05-23 21:56:51 UTC

James Hilliard via bitcoin-dev

40

replies

I do not support the BIP 148 UASF

started 2017-04-14 12:56:31 UTC

2017-05-23 20:46:02 UTC

Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

A BIP proposal for conveniently referring to confirmed transactions

started 2017-05-23 20:30:58 UTC

2017-05-23 20:30:58 UTC

Велеслав via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

Proposal to allow users to configure the maximum block weight based on a support threshold

started 2017-05-23 15:50:37 UTC

2017-05-23 15:50:37 UTC

Tomas via bitcoin-dev

8

replies

Rolling UTXO set hashes

started 2017-05-16 01:01:14 UTC

2017-05-23 09:47:48 UTC

Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev

5

replies

A proposal to reintroduce the disabled script opcodes

started 2017-05-19 17:03:59 UTC

2017-05-22 21:43:11 UTC

Ethan Heilman via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

BIP135 implementation on Bitcoin Core available for review

started 2017-05-22 17:10:20 UTC

2017-05-22 17:10:20 UTC

Sancho Panza via bitcoin-dev

7

replies

A BIP proposal for segwit addresses

started 2017-03-21 02:35:08 UTC

2017-05-21 01:13:13 UTC

Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev

16

replies

BIP: Block signal enforcement via tx fees

started 2017-05-13 00:22:56 UTC

2017-05-20 10:05:43 UTC

Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev

3

replies

BIP Proposal: Rate Limiting with server specified Proof of Work challenges

started 2017-05-08 07:48:54 UTC

2017-05-19 17:03:06 UTC

Karl Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev

5

replies

Treating ‘ASICBOOST’ as a Security Vulnerability

started 2017-05-18 18:44:47 UTC

2017-05-19 17:01:59 UTC

Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev

0

replies

BIP39 (mnemonic seeds) Unicode normalization compatibility issue

started 2017-05-17 22:01:04 UTC

2017-05-17 22:01:04 UTC

Zach Lym via bitcoin-dev

4

replies

TXO commitments do not need a soft-fork to be useful

started 2017-02-23 07:11:47 UTC

2017-05-16 17:23:53 UTC

Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev